Another reason why I always remove -w (use warnings) in production systems ... is that I don't want to confront users with errormessages they won't understand or won't be able to do anything against.
How does removing -w aid that? Warnings (even with fatalsToBrowser, since warnings by their very nature aren't fatal) only appear in the server error log, which isn't going to be seen by users.
In deployed code there shouldn't be any warnings generated, but should something of a dubious nature occur surely it's better for the warnings to be available in the log than not at all?
In reply to Re: Does fatalsToBrowser give too much information to a cracker?
by Smylers
in thread Does fatalsToBrowser give too much information to a cracker?
by rinceWind
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |