I'm a librarian by training. (So I'm a self-taught coder - which maybe explains a lot of lameish posts :) )
Anyways, if I'm referring to a book in a post, I'll always link to further info - some sort of authorative source about the title, that preferably
adds value. Most Library Catalog records do not add much value imho - only basic bibliographic description e.g. Library of Congress full record for the
Camel (This url might break as it includes a kind of pid)
Now I could be wrong but Amazon probably adds the most value, (in terms of the most reviews, sample chapters, recommendations etc, but I can't link there 'cos of the patents issue. Accordingly, I link to fatbrain.com.
If anyone has a better compromise, I'd appreciate learning about it.
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.