The code I offered is exactly the same as uri_escape() simply because if you are going to suggest an alternative it seems logical to KISS. I agree with you that URI:Escape is not optimal and always roll my own. Like you I do not exclude ; & + and = (also ?)
I think a good working knowledge of URI encodings is an important thing for anyone who works with CGI
cheers
tachyon
s&&rsenoyhcatreve&&&s&n.+t&"$'$`$\"$\&"&ee&&y&srve&&d&&print
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: incorrect use of URI::Escape?
by tachyon
in thread incorrect use of URI::Escape?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |