I am ashamed to reveal this, but I have no idea what you are talking about.
You are talking about ortogonality of big components that you can treat as black box objects that you access thru methods.
No, I don't. I say that the concepts are similar at times. And I do not limit myself to big components, I even mention subroutines (which is to me usually a small one).
The rest... I am sure that is correct in itself. I don't really see what it has to do with orthogonality, or how that affects the validity of black box designs. Orthogonality to me has nothing to do with how a language is to be constructed, or how it is constructed. It is a way to design programs and projects. Although *writing* an interpreter for a language can of course benefit from this principle.
If I am simply stupid here, feel free to explain and elaborate, so even I can understand. :) And so I know if I should give you ++ or -- *grin*.
You have moved into a dark place.
It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.