The 2 programs listed are not equivalent. If you want to rephrase Ovid's example to match your example, it would be something like:
sub Ovid_Clear_MakePtag2{ my $fixme = shift; # take in our parameters return join "", # join with nothing map { "<p>$_</p>" } # wrap each line in <p></p> tags split "\r\n", $fixme; # break apart on the newlines }
Or even:
sub Abstract_Clear_MakePtag{ my $fixme = shift; # take in our parameters return "<p>" . join("</p><p>", split "\r\n", $fixme) . "</p>" }
which uses 2 concepts: split and join (really one concept).

Would this make a good "clear" example?

As for my opinion, I'd go with your example being the clearer of the 3 examples so far.


In reply to Re: What is clear code ? by abstracts
in thread What is clear code ? by mandog

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.