Am I wrong?
Yes, you are wrong.
foo() is called with a single scalar argument which is precisely equal to scalar @ary or in other words the number of elements in @ary rather than a ref to it. I suggest you might like to 1) run the sample code where we print shift in foo and 2) follow the links I presented to learn more. I have a fair handle on scalar and array context BTW
cheers
tachyon
s&&rsenoyhcatreve&&&s&n.+t&"$'$`$\"$\&"&ee&&y&srve&&d&&print
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Enforcing formal arguments at compile time?
by tachyon
in thread Enforcing formal arguments at compile time?
by dargosch
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |