I'm thinking of this in a boolean context, so what you call limiting I wasn't thinking of as limiting in this context. Good point though. However, this is a hideously ugly solution that could easily be taken care of by allowing question marks in subroutine names.
In reply to Re: Re: Question Marks in Subroutine Names
by dug
in thread Question Marks in Subroutine Names
by dug
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |