Looks to me like someone may have made a couple of (bad?) simplifying assumptions:
The approach you're taking hard-codes these assumptions.
Wouldn't it be better to provide a queue that the salespeople could take the next request from? That would let the salespeople load balance amongst themselves, and would still provide management metrics (e.g., the rate at which different salespeople absorb requests).
In reply to Re: sequential file handling (again)
by dws
in thread sequential file handling (again)
by airblaine
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |