$A += ('(A)' =~ m(\(A\)))[0] == ('(A)' =~ m((A)))[0]; $A += ('(A)' =~ m|\(A\)|)[0] == ('(A)' =~ m|(A)|)[0];
you can contribute by sending to $A++@mongueurs.net and /msg BooK if your contribution does not appear soon enough.
-- stefp -- check out TeXmacs wiki
Due to the lack of feedback. I ask the question more clearly
Is it a documented feature that qr() and m()
behave oddly with bacckslashed paren while qr// and m// don't?
See below how qr(\(a\)) and qr|\(a\)| behave
differently?
DB<1> $a = qr((a)); print "'$a' "; print '(a)' =~ m|$a| '(?-xism:(a))' a DB<2> $a = qr(\(a\)); print "'$a' "; print '(a)' =~ m|$a| '(?-xism:(a))' a DB<3> $a = qr(\\(a\\)); print "'$a' "; print '(a)' =~ m|$a| '(?-xism:\\(a\\))' DB<4> $a = qr|\(a\)|; print "'$a' "; print '(a)' =~ m|$a| '(?-xism:\(a\))' 1
tye explained it to me:" backslashing the delimiter allows it to be inside the delimited text, it doesn't cause the backslash to be included in the string as well". Thanks tye.
In reply to bug or feature? $A++ certainly :) by stefp
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |