Most reviews are written by a single person. But I was thinking that maybe it would be fun to do a review as a community. In other words: how many problems can we spot in a certain text, and how well are they compensated by the good stuff? If we take the tutorial by Robert Pepper as an example, the more experienced Perl hackers will probably find a lot of mistakes, but Perl beginners might want to point out the well written structure or the good explanation of some subject. Because most reviews are written by a single person, they often lack the necessary ambivalence.

Would reviewing something in a discussion thread be possible without intermonk fights? If so, how do you feel about this? 

- Yes, I reinvent wheels.
- Spam: Visit eurotraQ.

In reply to Community review by Juerd

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.