I might be missing something myself, but isn't JPEG a compressed format itself? If that were the case, wouldn't fiddling with the quality parameter result in different levels of compression?
A quick scan of google didn't show me anything to set "jpeg" apart from "compressed jpeg" - most links were describing jpegs as compressed when compared to formats such as bitmap.
"All you need is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure."-- Mark Twain
In reply to Re: Image::Magick and JPEG Compression
by webfiend
in thread Image::Magick and JPEG Compression
by OzzyOsbourne
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |