I don't see any reason to put CGI.pm calls in a tt2 template. You lose one of the biggest advantages of the toolkit: that html people can read and maintain the templates. And, you know, html is good at laying out pages. why would you do it in perl?
i've always thought the html output functions of CGI.pm a rather odd half measure, but it's one which you no longer need: you're achieving a much more effective separation of delivery and display by other means.
updated: rambled some more
In reply to Re: TT2 -- A Matter of Style
by thpfft
in thread TT2 -- A Matter of Style
by DamnDirtyApe
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |