I am curious as to the experience of others with regard to their experience with natural language stemming for site indexes. I ask this as I am in the process of rewriting a site search engine (to improve maintainability and to fit the corporate application environment) and have could across a number of discussions regarding natural language stemming in this type of application.

For those unfamiliar with this concept, stemming is the process of reducing a word to its stem or root form - This allows similar words such as computer and computing to be conflated or reduced to a single root (for example, comput), thereby reducing index dictionary size and in theory, reducing storage requirements and processing time - A further discussion on this concept can be found here.

While this type of processing allows for reducing index dictionary keys, I am concerned about he likelihood for stemming errors whereby dissimilar words may be stemmed to a similar root, particularly given that indexing speed and space requirements should not be an issue in the application environment - See here for a discussion on over- and under-stemming errors.

And so I ask a barage of questions:

• What are the experiences of fellow monks with natural language stemming?
• Have other monks found better results, as measured by minimal stemming errors, via one stemming algorithm (for example, Paice-Husk, Porter, etc.) over another?
• And in particular, what are other monks experiences with the Porter algorithm of stemming implemented in Lingua::Stem?

 

My thanks in advance

 

---

---

Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!

Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.

Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.

Please read these before you post! —

• How do I compose an effective node title?
• How do I post a question effectively?
• Markup in the Monastery

Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:

a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr

You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)

	For:		Use:
	&		&
	<		&lt;
	>		&gt;
	[		&#91;
	]		&#93;

Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?

See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.