XSLT isn't quite as bad as it looks at first glance. I haven't seen the O'Reily book myself, but I did manage to get a decent start from the tutorial at W3Schools. I leatned enough to replace some pretty nasty looping structures in some of my scripts with much more elegant (and faster) XSL transforms using XML::LibXML and XML::LibXSLT.
<xsl:rattus/>
In reply to Re: Re: Poor Man's XML?
by rattusillegitimus
in thread Poor Man's XML?
by Cody Pendant
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |