there isn't a great mechanism for module review of this kind here.

What's wrong with the Code Catacombs now? The only thing I can think of is that it isn't the most prominent of sections. You can't frontpage posts and new entries are a fair ways down the Newest Nodes page. Still it seems like a decent place to post modules for review.

Perhaps something along the lines of Increasing Visibility of Reviews and Tutorials but for the Code Catacombs would be in order.

In reply to Re: Section for Posting Modules by cjf
in thread The Return of the Son of theMecha-Robotic Copy of the Clone of the Evil Twin of the Sequel to the Code Catacombs (episode 12) by erikharrison

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.