I don't have such a proprietary stance on reply note titles, and would be happy to defer to the editors in this case. If Editors feel right in changing the title of a root node, then changing titles of notes that use the default Re: mechanism should present no further moral hazard. I agree that deliberately altered titles, such as yours above, should be immune from tampering.

The confusion can arise in Newest Nodes, wherein it can be difficult to determine by inspection which notes are associated with which root nodes. Yes, one can click on notes to see what they bind to, but that grates against my sense of Laziness.

Thanks for your consideration,

-Mark

In reply to Re: I do not think so by kvale
in thread Synchronization of root and reply nodes by kvale

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.