All of these have the same effect on the string...use Benchmark; sub a { $_ = "this is a\ntest\n"; s/(?:\s+|\n+)//gc; } sub b { $_ = "this is a\ntest\n"; s/\s+//gc; } sub c { $_ = "this is a\ntest\n"; tr/\n\r\t //d; } timethese(250000,{ a => \&a, b => \&b, c => \&c }); Benchmark: timing 250000 iterations of a, b, c... a: 5 wallclock secs ( 4.18 usr + 0.01 sys = 4.19 CPU) @ 59 +665.87/s (n=250000) b: 1 wallclock secs ( 1.61 usr + 0.03 sys = 1.64 CPU) @ 15 +2439.02/s (n=250000) c: 1 wallclock secs ( 0.66 usr + 0.02 sys = 0.68 CPU) @ 36 +7647.06/s (n=250000)
for one... \s includes \n, so the right part of that doesn't ever actually do anything useful, but I believe it still gets checked each time to make sure it doesn't make a better match... I believe in most cases a character class would be better for that, but that is really irrelevant, since stripping single characters is much faster with tr///d
Just thought I would point it out...
- Ant
- Some of my
best work - (1 2 3)
In reply to Re: Re: Extracting text after a keyword
by suaveant
in thread Extracting text after a keyword
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |