Keep in mind that this is a weighted distribution: three categories with weight 10 are worth one category with weight 30 (so if N=2, you'd want 3/1 rather than 2/2).
This looks to me like a constrained (order must not change) variant on the bin packing problem. Bin packing is NP-complete in the general case (IIRC), but the order constraint makes this quite tractable (see merlyn's typesetting comment). This problem has a rather good (n lg n or n^2) solution via dynamic programming: the typesetting problem was on one of my assignments in an advanced algorithms class. (Hey, did Ovid just post a homework problem? ;-b) I'll dig through my old notes when I get home from work and see if I can find it. In the mean time, you (Ovid) might look at Text::Format for ideas.
Update: D'oh! Another constraint on the text formatting problem that isn't present here is a maximum on line length (bin size), which makes it hard to reject a bogus solution (too much in one bin) quickly. On the other hand, this solution is constrained by number of bins, which the text formatting solution isn't. Hmm.... (Great problem, Ovid!)
--
The hell with paco, vote for Erudil!
:wq
In reply to Re(2): Puzzle: need a more general algorithm
by FoxtrotUniform
in thread Puzzle: need a more general algorithm
by Ovid
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |