Why?

Honestly why?

Ok, forget that for a second, do you have any clue as to what kind of a user base you've got (or rather your module -- how many people use it)?

In the very least I think you should either do like the HTML::Parser folk did, and make with a 

HTML::TokeParser::Simple->new ( api_version => 3 );

[download]
or just go with a namespace change HTML::TokeParser::Simpler. This really depends on if you're going to put in the work to keep the old style api, or just changing things around completely (even if its mostly cosmetic).

Other than that I only have a question, are you going to go with AUTOLOAD now?

In reply to Re: RFC: Wider scope for HTML::TokeParser::Simple by PodMaster
in thread RFC: Wider scope for HTML::TokeParser::Simple by Ovid

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.