Yes, that's the solution. Is there no way without look-behind assertions? It seems like a common thing to do, 'not match' a expression of grouped letters (i.e. a word).
Thanks for your answer :)
In reply to Re: Re: stupid question about regexp - not matching a word
by december
in thread stupid question about regexp - not matching a word
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |