Maybe I just don't understand WHY the ref($cargocult) idea is so bad. To me, it makes perfect sense... If someone calls the constructor on an instance rather than the class, it forces it to act as if it were called on the class. Isn't this "correct" in most cases?

new is new and clone is clone. Conviently merging the two into one and differentiating by the call context feels like an icky version of polymorphism.

btw: Great node, but I gotta tell ya- there are days when I wish I was bagging groceries rather than coding/debugging/supporting. :)

Here are some nodes w/ some really good explanations:

Ovid's (Ovid - minor code nits) Re: Adding autoloaded methods to symbol table with using strict refs
merlyn's ref($proto) - just say no!

---

---

Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!

Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.

Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.

Please read these before you post! —

• How do I compose an effective node title?
• How do I post a question effectively?
• Markup in the Monastery

Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:

a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr

You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)

	For:		Use:
	&		&
	<		&lt;
	>		&gt;
	[		&#91;
	]		&#93;

Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?

See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.