I'm planning on using HTML::Template, CGI::Application, and DBI with MySQL and using MySQL's query cache. Cron will generate images and possibly pdfs or word documents at night or when modified, the main load being searches on a product catalog by up to 2000 distributors, and the templating.
I am leaning toward mod_perl for performance, though because of very limited time to build it, may develop without mod_perl (but with strict) first.
I'm wondering about how much speed is gained in maintaining a persistent connection with Apache::DBI, and with templates being cached, so I can make an better decision about using mod_perl. I know it's great, and have used it, but I don't have time to wrestle with CGI::Application and restart the server a hundred times. I'm looking at. Application Performance using DBI and mod_perl now.
I also was just looking at The HTML::Template page and it mentions a 90% speed increase using Template caching in mod_perl, plus a way to save a ton of memory by sharing the template cache between the processes.
In reply to Re: Database driven web content: live or tape?
by mattr
in thread Database driven web content: live or tape?
by talexb
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |