In order to test, I created a simple sort subroutine inside the Benchmark::timeit call. I've bumped the $count up to 2000 to really get some decent feedback.

I would tend to multiply the value of $count by 50 to a 100 or more. 3 seconds is barely enough time to compare anything. 0.39 seconds difference in CPU time is mere noise.

Remember that a difference of 5 to 10 percent in benchmark performance can also be considered noise. Hence you would want to see 30 seconds vs. 35 seconds (for example) in order to conclude a real (although minor) difference. 30 seconds vs. 75 seconds... now you're starting to talk about something interesting.


print@_{sort keys %_},$/if%_=split//,'= & *a?b:e\f/h^h!j+n,o@o;r$s-t%t#u'

In reply to Re: Performance of Perl references by grinder
in thread Performance of Perl references by fuzzyping

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.