I'm about to write a spell checker as part of a content-management system for a website. I looked at the Text::Ispell and Text::Pspell, and I like the looks of the former a bit more - I find the interface a bit more intuitive, and it seems to do useful things that the latter doesn't, such as parsing a whole text string rather than just spell checking a single word.
But before I start I'd be very grateful for any observations from sibling monks, particularly
Edited: ~Tue Jul 23 15:42:38 2002 (GMT), by footpad:Added missing </ul> tag (and revised formatting for improved XML parsability).
In reply to Spell Checkers - Text::Ispell by George_Sherston
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |