This is a perlrun Windows question.

On our network, I provide users with several ways to use perl scripts. The most popular method among Windows users has been to convert the script to a batch file, launched with a shortcut on the desktop. The user can then drag an icon or group of icons onto the shortcut, which provides the script with the argument list of files or folders for the operation.

In several of the more complicated scripts, I use Getopt::Long for parsing the options. But, I have discovered that NT4 and Win9x do not properly handle the options, using this method. When the shortcut is launched without arguments, the options are parsed normally. But if the argument list is provided by dropping file or folder icons onto the shortcut, the options are silently ignored.

Options are parsed as expected in Windows 2000 and XP.

My question: Do you know of a way to cause NT4 and Win9x shortcuts to behave the same as Windows 2000?

A little test script follows the READMORE tag, if you have opportunity to try it for yourself.

@rem = '--*-Perl-*-- @echo off if "%OS%" == "Windows_NT" goto WinNT perl -x -S "%0" %1 %2 %3 %4 %5 %6 %7 %8 %9 goto endofperl :WinNT perl -x -S %0 %* if NOT "%COMSPEC%" == "%SystemRoot%\system32\cmd.exe" goto endofperl if %errorlevel% == 9009 echo You do not have Perl in your PATH. if errorlevel 1 goto script_failed_so_exit_with_non_zero_val 2>nul goto endofperl @rem '; #!/usr/bin/perl -w #line 15 #testprob.bat use strict; use Getopt::Long; # Print Argument list prior to calling GetOptions print STDERR join("|", @ARGV), "\n"; my $always = ''; my $col = -1; my $recursive = ''; my $verbose = 0; print STDERR "(GetOptions called here)\n"; GetOptions ('always!' => \$always, 'recursive!' => \$recursive, 'col=i' => \$col, 'verbose!' => \$verbose); # Print Argument list after calling GetOptions print STDERR join("|", @ARGV), "\n"; wait_close("Process completed\n",4); sub wait_close{ my ($warning, $timer) = @_; $timer = int($timer) || 2; my $i; print "$warning\n"; for ($i=$timer; $i >= 1; $i--){ print "window will close in $i \r"; sleep 1; } exit; } __END__ :endofperl

In the shortcut to the batchfile, the commandline looks like this:

\\netshare\testprob.bat --noalways -v -c=3 --recursive

On all Windows versions tested, the output without an argument list is:
--noalways|-v|-c=3|--recursive
(GetOptions is here)

Process completed

Now, dropping a list of icons onto the shortcut, versions behave differently
Windows 2000 and XP:

--noalways|-v|-c=3|--recursive|C:\c-media|C:\bin|C:\bats
(GetOptions is here)
C:\c-media|C:\bin|C:\bats
Process completed


NT4 and Win9x:
C:\c-media|C:\bin|C:\bats
(GetOptions is here)
C:\c-media|C:\bin|C:\bats
Process completed

Note that the options list is never seen by the script. Options are deleted by Windows, and only the argument list is presented to the script.

Can NT4 and Win9x shortcuts be caused to behave the same as Windows 2000?
mkmcconn
edit format and removed typo noticed by BrowserUK


In reply to Getopts with NT4 and Win9x shortcuts by mkmcconn

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.