Linux RH6.0 on same machine (but different perl).Benchmark: timing 1000000 iterations of Grep, Max, Ternary... Grep: 9 wallclock secs (10.02 usr + 0.00 sys = 10.02 CPU) @ 99 +760.57/s (n=1000000) Max: 21 wallclock secs (20.92 usr + 0.00 sys = 20.92 CPU) @ 47 +801.15/s (n=1000000) Ternary: 22 wallclock secs (21.31 usr + 0.00 sys = 21.31 CPU) @ 46 +926.33/s (n=1000000) This is perl, v5.6.0 built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread
Benchmark: timing 1000000 iterations of Grep, Max, Ternary... Grep: 8 wallclock secs ( 8.39 usr + 0.00 sys = 8.39 CPU) Max: 26 wallclock secs (25.82 usr + 0.00 sys = 25.82 CPU) Ternary: 27 wallclock secs (25.67 usr + 0.00 sys = 25.67 CPU) This is perl, version 5.005_03 built for i386-linux
In reply to Re: Algorithm Efficiency vs. Specialized Hardware?
by t0mas
in thread Algorithm Efficiency vs. Specialized Hardware?
by Russ
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |