But we are both in agreement that there isnt a good way to do this
Agreed. Anything that tries to generalize beyond "\Q$string\E" requires a variety of assumptions.
BTW, is the . really necessary? I dont think it is as the s/// will just skip the char if it doesnt match.
Just trying to be careful :-) In case I neglected something with those classes, and that something also required escaping, then just leaving it in the string wouldn't result in a valid re. (I don't tend to use POSIX char classes either, so I wasn't sure exactly how inclusive I was being).
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Regular Expression Builder
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Regular Expression Builder
by Rich36
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |