It's about the risk/reward ratio. Why go to all of the trouble to include a seldom used keyword that introduces so many bugs? If you need chop, there are plenty of ways to duplicate the functionality. Further, if you go to the trouble of duplicating that, it probably means that it's really what you need.
So many things are being added to Perl, it makes sense to remove items that are seldom used and prone to cause problems. I rarely see an instance of chop that isn't a bug (you should see all of the code reviews I've done on applicants lately!).
Cheers,
Ovid
Join the Perlmonks Setiathome Group or just click on the the link and check out our stats.
In reply to Re: a farewell to chop (good)
by Ovid
in thread a farewell to chop
by John M. Dlugosz
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |