Simple question, partially inspired by Command line tool coding style?. In a simple decision hash tree thingy
my %hash=( opt1=>\&opt1, opt2=>\&opt2, opt3=>\&opt3,); &{$hash{$value}};
What about replacing the subs (sub opt1 {}, etc) with perl files? And your end answer would be do $hash{$value} ? Is this a bad idea? The reasoning for this would it would help to seperate implementation from logic (i hope), in that you would have a series of files for each option, as opposed to having to modify one file, as well as being able to swap in different files very easily. But, as far as i know, do is generally regarded as bad?

In reply to Do file.pl (replacing subs?) by BUU

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.