If I'm not completely missing the point, it sounds as though IPC::Open2 or IPC::Open3 will do what you want with a little more red tape required than the backticks need.
Update: I would appreciate if whoever --ed this could tell me if they thought I was wrong or rude. I don't see either in my post.
Makeshifts last the longest.
In reply to Re: Backticked commands and the readpipe blues
by Aristotle
in thread Backticked commands and the readpipe blues
by grinder
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |