(Edit: I agree with tye, it's not the difference between string, int, or ref compares that's going to make or break the script. But it was still a fun benchmark. Oh, and 10 or 15% over 3 seconds is fairly consistently repeatable. 5% would be "noise". :))

Interesting that you wind up with strings fastest. I wind up with numbers fastest, hands down, using 5.6.1 on Cygwin.

I agree that this is a micro (or nano:)) optimization; I was just responding to his query as to why the ref compare was so slow in his code. 

$ perl ref_cmp.pl
Benchmark: running numbers 2, numbers 4, qrefs 2, qrefs 4, refs 2, ref
+s 4, strings 2, strings 4, each for at least 3 CPU seconds...
 numbers 2:  4 wallclock secs ( 3.08 usr +  0.00 sys =  3.08 CPU) @ 74
+0880.04/s (n=2278947)
 numbers 4:  5 wallclock secs ( 3.18 usr +  0.03 sys =  3.21 CPU) @ 49
+7290.48/s (n=1593816)
   qrefs 2:  3 wallclock secs ( 3.08 usr + -0.01 sys =  3.07 CPU) @ 64
+0138.26/s (n=1967785)
   qrefs 4:  4 wallclock secs ( 3.02 usr +  0.00 sys =  3.02 CPU) @ 42
+8683.86/s (n=1296340)
    refs 2:  4 wallclock secs ( 3.11 usr +  0.01 sys =  3.12 CPU) @ 41
+4780.49/s (n=1292456)
    refs 4:  5 wallclock secs ( 3.02 usr +  0.01 sys =  3.03 CPU) @ 28
+0746.21/s (n=851784)
 strings 2:  3 wallclock secs ( 3.06 usr +  0.02 sys =  3.08 CPU) @ 64
+2239.02/s (n=1974885)
 strings 4:  4 wallclock secs ( 3.11 usr +  0.01 sys =  3.12 CPU) @ 47
+6537.87/s (n=1484892)
              Rate refs 4 refs 2 qrefs 4 strings 4 numbers 4 qrefs 2 s
+trings 2 numbers 2
refs 4    280746/s     --   -32%    -35%      -41%      -44%    -56%  
+    -56%      -62%
refs 2    414780/s    48%     --     -3%      -13%      -17%    -35%  
+    -35%      -44%
qrefs 4   428684/s    53%     3%      --      -10%      -14%    -33%  
+    -33%      -42%
strings 4 476538/s    70%    15%     11%        --       -4%    -26%  
+    -26%      -36%
numbers 4 497290/s    77%    20%     16%        4%        --    -22%  
+    -23%      -33%
qrefs 2   640138/s   128%    54%     49%       34%       29%      --  
+     -0%      -14%
strings 2 642239/s   129%    55%     50%       35%       29%      0%  
+      --      -13%
numbers 2 740880/s   164%    79%     73%       55%       49%     16%  
+     15%        --

[download]

--
Mike

In reply to Re: (tye)Re: speed of comparisons of things by RMGir
in thread speed of comparisons of things by John M. Dlugosz

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.