These look like constant subs being redefined. I think that problem was fixed in later versions of Perl. It shouldn't cause a problem.

UPDATE: I just looked at the code and I see the problem. Business::OnlinePayment defines some subs using a routine called "build_subs", but doesn't check to see if they have been defined first. It shouldn't do that. Looks like it expected to run in a CGI environment and not be instantiated twice. This won't cause problems, but it will cause warnings. It would be easy to fix, by making minor changes to the new() sub in Business::OnlinePayment.

In reply to Re: Business::OnlinePayment redefined subroutines, or the little module that doesn't like being used twice by perrin
in thread Business::OnlinePayment redefined subroutines, or the little module that doesn't like being used twice by JPaul

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.