1. What do you feel you are hampered or limited by, either artificially or legitimately.
    I find that I have a particular approach to problem solving and development which is not always welcome. Having grown up with green screen applications, I feel comfortable with server and back-end technology. The Microsoft boys and the Java-ites both eye me with suspicion, and have little or no idea what I do - unless I get to work on a collaborative project, typically client/server.

  2. Do you align yourself more with being an autodidact or non-autodidact.
    Depends. I did a Computer Science degree many moons ago. I have also done the occasional employer sponsored CBT and training course. However, I do see myself more as an autodidact. I taught myself C, Perl, HTML, and several other languages that I have needed.

  3. How has that alignment effected you professionally.
    This depends on what the job requirement is. What is more important to me is the ability to adapt to a new programming team, standards and ways of working.

  4. Did you at some point (semi)realign yourself for personal/financial improvement?
    I believe, certainly for me, probably for most of us, this is a continuous process. Unless you adapt and learn new skills, you are dead in the job market. Whether these are autodidact or non-autodidact depends on the programming language. I am working on a Java CBT, and I may well be doing a Java certification later this year - all in the name of career progress and flexibility. For Perl, I recommend the autodidactic approach, supported by suitable books (Lama, Camel) and forums like Perlmonks.

  5. If you did realign yourself was it worth the effort and in what way?
    I see it more as adaptation than realignment. In my case the autodidactic approach has earned me more than one job, contract and assignment, and has boosted my reputation. In future I may well need some formal certification to keep pace with the competition.

In reply to Re: Autodidact Followup by rinceWind
in thread Autodidact Followup by trs80

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.