He then finds the answer in the spec (which one I don't know peschkaj does not explain)
Wouldn't it be better that when we make a mistake like this (I know we all do) that instead of asking for deletion, we leave the node and post a follow up with the answer. So, that someone searching through the archives would be pointed right to the spec (in this case) and the answer.
I have a feeling having a couple of extra nodes lying around is not going to be a problem. I'm also quite sure that the poster would not get downvoted if he|she posted the answer
| Mynd you, mønk bites Kan be pretti nasti... |
Edited 2002-11-03 by Ovid
In reply to Deletions and the good of the community by grep
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |