Fair point :-)
What I was trying to say (badly) was that I didn't see how tie and UNIVERSAL would fit together.
I guess you could argue for a virtual class Tied, with subclasses of Tied::Scalar, Tied::Hash, etc. but it's probably not worth the effort, and would annoy the people who don't think of tie in an OO way.
In reply to Re^3: a strong UNIVERSAL class
by adrianh
in thread a strong UNIVERSAL class
by pg
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |