...support the concept of interface just like those typical OO languages do.
Be careful with your broad generalizations. At least one "typical" OO language I commonly use does not have interfaces. Other than that, I agree with most of the other posters in asking "Why?" and stating that "UNIVERSAL is not the place".
In reply to Re: a strong UNIVERSAL class
by t'mo
in thread a strong UNIVERSAL class
by pg
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |