Just to be a tad pedantic Lisp is not a functional programming language. A functional language has no side effects (and a purely functional language can be great fun to program). For an overview of the difference how about this. Many of the neat features of Lisp can best be explored in dialects such as scheme which has certainly been one of the influences in Perl's design (e.g. closures)
If you really want to explore language design then you could try doing all the examples in Abelson and Sussman in Perl (I am sure it is possible and it would certainly be both interesting and a learning experience)
In reply to Re: Functional programming with Perl
by hawtin
in thread Functional programming with Perl
by spurperl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |