What I am proposing is that the intermediate format, something like 'perlcc -B' ....
I've probably overlooked something here, but how will this 'intermediate format' differ from Parrot bytecode?
In reply to Re: Should we have PerlC and PRE?
by cjf-II
in thread Should we have PerlC and PRE?
by dingus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |