One thing I did recently discover is that a nearly full hash will tend to have its elements in some kind of well defined order.
For example if you do letter frequency analysis of a large document because you think this might be fun for cryptography you end up with a hash %frequencies which contains most of the ASCII character set from 32 to 127 and they are also in nearly alphabetical order that is keys %frequencies produces a list ... 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D' ...
Dingus
In reply to Re: Re: Re: what does that value mean, when you evaluate hash in a scalar context?
by dingus
in thread what does that value mean, when you evaluate hash in a scalar context?
by pg
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |