Whoever decided that browsers would "do their best" with invalid HTML was responsible for the nightmare of non-validating web pages that we have at the moment.

It may seem anoying sometimes, but regardless of how forgiving browsers may be, people (and machines) will allways be faliable, and will allways make mistakes. Would you prefer it if browsers just refused to show any page with the slightest HTML glitch?

Ultimately, the choice to "do their best with invalid HTML" can be traced back to the defacto mantra of the IETF... 

Be liberal in what you accept, and
conservative in what you send.

For more background, consult RFC791, RFC1122, and RFC1958,

In reply to Re: Re: Fixing ill-formed XML by hossman
in thread Fixing ill-formed XML by mush4brains

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.