IMHO - the most missing feature in the *Validate* modules is one that allows simple/clear expression of $x+$y == 42 type constraints, so this is the feature that would most justify a new module. Most (Data::Validate anyway) seem geared for required/optional tests.

you should also look at Params::Validate.

Ive yet to use any of the *validate* modules, but this one is on the top of my short-list. It has - to me - an intuitive interface thats geared for validating args to a function. It handles both named-params and positional, tho named is (always) clearer.

sub snafu {
   validate (@_, { foo => 'SCALAR', # foo must be scalar
                   arry => 'ARRAY', });
   # func body here
}

 

In reply to Re: New Module Consideration? by jimc
in thread New Module Consideration? by Flame

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.