Second, I'd like to thank my dope-iness for taking so long to reply to this. I had a reply done, but I managed to hit the nice little X instead of the _, and well, you know the rest.
So lets see if I can recreate any of my original post.
I'd like to say that I understand and appreciate the idea of punishing someone's comments if they do not represent what the community would like to see. And I'd further say I'm happy to comply and take these negative votes if my post falls under that realm.
However, the brevity and wording of my original post was specifically targeted to avoid what Ovid states as: "attack(ing) ideas instead of Monks". I hope that no one actually thinks I was attempting to attack maverick! My appologies to maverick and to everyone if you all thought so. (I admit that I did not put much of an effort into attacking an idea).
My original intent was simply to "kindly joke" (Dive, Dive, Dive!), and thus remind everyone that an ocassional holy war is good for you (helps the brain).
In anycase, I'd ++ your post Ovid, but I used all my votes much earlier in the day. I recommend everyone else ++ him in my stead if you would :) .
Ciao,
Gryn
In reply to Attacks, arguements, and such.
by gryng
in thread Sorting an Associative Array?
by target
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |