However dug's post is definitely unique, although it is not "good", (I know he knew this ;-).

Is this just a knee-jerk reaction against using symbolic references? You go on to give a brief explanation of what they are for the OP's benefit, but no explanation of why the are not good in this case (or any case).

I'm not trying to be obtuse, just curious to hear why you think they are bad in *this* case. There is an interesting thread on comp.lang.perl.misc here that talks about this topic explicitly. I'm sure there are more as well.

Thanks,
-- dug

In reply to Re: Re: Naming Subs by dug
in thread Naming Subs by eoin

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.