With the added maintainance and wasted space of a dispatch table stored in a hashYou are aware that the symbol table is basically a dispatch hash on steroids? That invalidates your wasted space comment. Actually, depending on the case, you can let a dispatch hash go out of scope, freeing memory naturally. You can get rid of the memory occupied by regular subs and their symbol table entries, but it's rather a lot of work in comparison. Not to mention that keeping user exposed symref interfaces safe takes at least as much maintenance work as setting up a dispatch hash.
Makeshifts last the longest.
In reply to Re^5: Naming Subs
by Aristotle
in thread Naming Subs
by eoin
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |