At this point I would not use XML::Parser as the base for a new tool, I would go the XML::LibXML way, unless libxml2 does nor run on the system you plan to use.
If you need W3C schema support note that Andy Wardley just released []. I (and I am not alone in this, see this (long!) thread on xml-dev) don't like W3C schemas though, Relax NG (pronounced relaxing) seems like a much more sane way to go, see this message from James Clarke.
In reply to Re: How to implement XML languages
by mirod
in thread How to implement XML languages
by gildir
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |