That's certainly a possibility. However (and I'm aware that this may sound like me attempting to move the goalposts), in well factored code the method is likely to be short enough that anyone reading the code will be able to see at a glance that bar will be expected to do_that_thang so the validator declaration is unlikely to introduce any real clarification.

Actually, my whole argument for not having much in the way of code documentation is predicated on the belief that well factored code doesn't need much in the way of code documentation and, more strongly, that code that does need substantial explanatory documentation probably isn't well factored enough.

In reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Documenting Methods/Subs by pdcawley
in thread Documenting Methods/Subs by vek

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.