Disclaimer: I do not think that attaching multiple instances of the same type of magic to an SV is good.
sv_magicext() does not have as many restrictions as sv_magic() does. (In fact, sv_magic() is implemented in terms of sv_magicext()) You may need to refer to sv.c to determine what arguments sv_magicext() expects for '~' magic.
In reply to Re: XS and preserving magic
by MarkM
in thread XS and preserving magic
by shotgunefx
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |