<shrug type=gallic>If you idea of obfuscation and mine differ, I'm sorry.</shrug> I spent 4 years in a comp sci cohort with pedants that would feel that they had made a valid point if they asked you to run a piece of code and input the wrong variable type (in C) and it crash. The fact that by removing the error checking meant the whole code fitted one over-head, escaped them. Perhaps I have the same weary mindset to these people and I applied it to you. My apologies if I have mistakenly grouped you with the nerds. In this case the code doesn't work with strict or warn, and frankly a null word is the same reversed, depends on your identification of a palindrome. I like your changes. It is not too removed from what I did, except that you've used interpolation. I was hoping for a response in regex. I will look at your code and see if I can reduce it more, just for fun. Thankyou. :-) Frankus.
In reply to RE: RE: Missing the point. by frankus
in thread aoxomoxoa by frankus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |