But since this isn't about private data... Anyhow I've got no problem with people who can go grab or alter the object in the method. I just think the object should be there. Right now it's not. This is a completely different concern.
Seeking Green geeks in Minnesota
In reply to Re^2: Why isn't ->can() curried?
by diotalevi
in thread Why isn't ->can() curried?
by diotalevi
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |