You wouldn't. But then I think it'd be pretty daft to call a method as a function seeing as how the implementing code is expecting an object as the first parameter.
Seeking Green geeks in Minnesota
In reply to Re^2: Why isn't ->can() curried?
by diotalevi
in thread Why isn't ->can() curried?
by diotalevi
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |